The Claptrap Propaganda About Guns in America


by Eric Zuesse, Strategic Culture:

In the 2008Ā five-to-four majority Heller decision defining what the Second Amendment means, the US Supreme Court said that the Amendmentā€™s ā€œprefatory clause,ā€ which stated the Amendmentā€™s ā€œpurpose,ā€ is irrelevant to understanding the Amendment, and must therefore be ignored when applying the Amendment to determine whether a given law has been passed which violates this Amendment. That Heller decision reversed 69 years of prior settled US Supreme Court rulings, and it basically ignored the key part of the Second Amendment itself ā€” the Amendmentā€™s very purpose ā€” in order, basically, to promote gun-sales. Heller was the most pro-gun-sales ruling ever by the US Supreme Court, and it blatantly lied about the US Constitution, in order to do that. Hereā€™s how:

The entirety of the Second Amendment is:Ā ā€œA well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.ā€

The Heller decision used the following absurd excuse as its ā€˜justificationā€™ for ignoring the Amendmentā€™s very purpose:

ā€œThe Amendmentā€™s prefatory clause announces a purpose, but does not limit or expand the scope of the second part, the operative clause. The operative clauseā€™s text and history demonstrate that it connotes an individual right to keep and bear arms.ā€

That wasnā€™t actually ā€œa purposeā€ butĀ theĀ purpose; and to ignore a lawā€™sĀ statedĀ purpose is outrageous and should never be tolerated by any judge ā€” especially a law thatā€™s part of the Constitution itself, and most especially when the nationā€™s Supreme Court is perpetrating this atrocity against the entire nation, which is an act of treachery to do. Such judges virtually spit upon the Constitution they are obligated to protect. Instead of the 2nd Amendmentā€™s stated purpose, the Court introduced its own,Ā alleged, purpose, from the Courtā€™s supposed investigation into the Amendmentā€™s history ā€” and they even lied aboutĀ that. The Heller decision went on to assert that the Amendmentā€™s purpose was a very different one from the stated purpose, and was a purpose which came from the ā€œAntifederalistsā€: the Heller ruling said ā€œThe Antifederalists feared that the Federal Government would disarm the people in order to disable this citizensā€™ militia.ā€ This supposed other ā€˜purposeā€™, which the five who signed the majority-decision accepted and which was supposedly inferred by them from ā€˜historyā€™ instead of from the Founders who wrote the Constitution and wrote the 2nd Amendment, with itsĀ statedĀ purpose, reigned for them, as if it were the ā€˜actualā€™ purpose of that Amendment.

However,Ā onlyĀ the Federalists had written the US Constitution. They did it duringĀ 1787-1791. They were opposed ā€” not supported ā€” by the Antifederalists. The AntifederalistsĀ opposedĀ the Constitution. They were the minority, and so the Constitution became democratically passedĀ asĀ Americaā€™s Constitution. Only after the US Confederacy, of slave-states during the subsequent 1860s US Civil War rebellion against the Federal Government, did theĀ anti-federalist position, of states-rights being supreme above the authority of the federal Government, become briefly re-establishedĀ in those rebelling states, and so those states re-established, but only in these slave-states, much of theĀ pre-American-Revolution system, against which the Founders had fought and won the Revolutionary War, though this time it was being applied without specific reliance upon the British monarchy and empire.

The new US Government ā€”Ā todayā€™sĀ US regime ā€” is mainly the nationwide restoration of the Southern Confederacy, which US President Abraham Lincoln had temporarily defeated during the Civil War and thereby secured the progress of democracy in America, which has since ended. The Southern Confederacy was a local and successful antifederalism, which became defeated by the Union, which restored the federalism that had been established by the Founders. But the Unionā€™s ā€” and the Foundersā€™ ā€” victory has increasingly been reversed, through treacherous actions, such as the US Supreme Courtā€™s decision in the Heller case.

Unfortunately, Lincolnā€™s progressive and democratic victory is being successfully challenged and defeated by todayā€™s American fascists, not only in the White House and Congress, but even on the US Supreme Court itself.

The Heller decision reflected the fundamental position of the Southern Confederacy (a feudalist society) (1861-1865) (to which America is returning in the modern, fascist or ā€œcorporationistā€ version), the positionĀ rejectingĀ the US Constitution. These modern far-right people have gradually rewritten the US Constitution, to comport more with the views that prevailed in the slaveholding South.

The Heller decision is one of an uncounted number of decisions by the US Supreme Court which have re-authorized the US Government as imposing a dictatorship (such as Americaā€™s Founders hadĀ rebelled against and overthrown and replaced, by their instituting, through a Revolution, a limited democracy).

In fact, the Second Amendment makes very clear what itsĀ sole and exclusiveĀ purpose is: ā€œA well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State.ā€ Itā€™s stated clearly, right there. The US Supreme Courtā€™s ā€˜interpretationā€™ is instead their insertion of a lie, which they claim to be based upon their own examination of ā€˜historyā€™, from which they supposedly infer a different or another ā€˜purposeā€™ for the Amendment. Only a fool can respect such judges as they. As a matter of historical fact, the actual debate, when that Amendment was being considered for addition to the US Constitution, was itself based upon the implicit understanding that everyone had, regarding what the then-clearĀ meaningĀ was, of ā€œa well regulated militia.ā€ That then-universally-recognized meaning was: all physically capable adult males who are organized under the laws of the individual states and operating under their stateā€™s laws as a military reserve force to be called up in emergency for battle, in case the US Congress, which is within the national (not inĀ anyĀ stateā€™s) Government, declares war, so as to defend the entire nation against a threatening aggressive foreign nation (such as, certainly, Britain then was, and still remained).

The meaning of ā€œa well regulated militiaā€ was, then, theĀ exact oppositeĀ of what the fascist judge who wrote the Heller decision said: ā€œto deny Congress power to abridge the ancient right of individuals to keep and bear arms.ā€ The 2nd Amendment had nothing to do with protecting the American people from an evil Congress. It was instituted to enable the entire federal Government to raise an army in a national emergency.

Read More @