Former New York Times Editor Accuses Paper of Running a Biased Anti-Trump News Agenda

0
918

from 21st Century Wire:

Since 2016, 21WIRE has been consistently making the case that the entire Trump-Russia fiasco was a fabrication and a political hoax. Two years later, as the Anglo-American political and media establishment’s Russiagate narrative rapidly collapses, a gradual backlash is happening from some of the more sensible corners of mainstream punditry. As MSM detractors begin to line-up against their own establishment media institutions, a civil war of sorts will start to foment between rival moguls.

What could follow these exhibits of dissension in the ranks of the mainstream is a potential for new ‘alternative’ media outlets to sprout-up from the ashes of discredited institutions like the New York Times and the Washington Post, in the hopes of correcting the course of an industry which has gone completely off the rails now.

The Daily Caller reports…

The first female executive editor of the New York Times, Jill Abramson, is bashing the paper’s “unmistakably anti-Trump” coverage in an upcoming book.

Abramson, who led the newspaper from 2011 to 2014, says that the storied newspaper has a business incentive to bash Trump regularly in its hard-news coverage because that is what the paper’s liberal readers and subscribers desire.

Writing in her soon-to-be published book,“Merchants of Truth: The Business of News and the Fight for Facts,” Abramson rips the Times for catering to the anti-Trump bias of its readers.

“Given its mostly liberal audience, there was an implicit financial reward for the Times in running lots of Trump stories, almost all of them negative: they drove big traffic numbers and, despite the blip of cancellations after the election, inflated subscription orders to levels no one anticipated,” Abramson writes.

According to excerpts of the book first published by Howard Kurtz of Fox News, Abramson believes that Dean Baquet, the current executive editor at the Times, has turned the paper into the “opposition party.”

Read More @ 21stCenturyWire.com