Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, Donald Trump and Jeffery Epstein-What Is the Truth?

0
616

by Dave Hodges, The Common Sense Show:

The Hill reported as late as December 6, 2018, that prosecutors working for a private investigative firm that also has been looking into the Clinton Foundation and their potential crimes. The firm, MDA Analytics LLC, reportedly has contacted the IRS, the Justice Department and the FBI’s Little Rock office with evidence from its own investigation. The Hill also reported that a whistleblower report handed over to the FBI and IRS in August 2017 included internal legal reviews, related to mingling of private and charity funds related to the Clinton Foundation activities conducted between 2008 and 2011. Those whistleblower reports raised serious legal issues related to compliance to IRS charity law and the exploits of the Clinton Foundation. However, this investigation has opened up a can of worms. After reviewing the following evidence, the readers will be forced to answer two questions:

  1. Are the Clintons and Donald Trump connected in nefarious activities related to Jeff Epstein, a convicted child molester?  Or, are the Clinton’s falsely blackmailing Trump into preventing him from acting against them?
  2. Is the aforementioned connection between the Clintons, Trump and Epstein explain why Trump has not prosecuted one member of the Deep State? Is Trump being falsely blackmailed?

Will Evidence of Epstein Island’s So-Called Shadowy Exploits Surface?

The CSS was contacted by an inside source which stated that Bill Clinton flagrantly comingled Bill Clinton’s “party funds” with the so-called charity endeavors of the Clinton Foundation and that some of the comingling was related to Bill Clinton’s “excursions” to Epstein Island in which it is rumored that a child brothel is maintained for the use and pleasure of the elite traveling to the Island. Does that sound far-fetched? Please consider the following from Vox:

Jeffrey Epstein could have gone to prison for life.

The money manager was accused of sexually abusing dozens of underage girls at his Palm Beach mansion between 2001 and 2006. But as Julie K. Brown reports at the Miami Herald, he ultimately got just 13 months in a county jail, thanks to a deal signed by Alexander Acosta, then the US Attorney for Miami and now President Trump’s secretary of labor. On Tuesday,Epstein settled a lawsuit in which some of his accusers were expected to testify, avoiding yet again the prospect of facing the women in court.

Epstein has said that any encounters he had with his accusers were consensual, and that he believed they were 18 at the time… (Editor’s Note: It is hard to not put an emphatic LOL on this last statement! When is it an appropriate defense to claim that a pedophile did not know the age of victims of sexual crimes?)

His (Epstein’s) friendships with famous people have led to speculation that they, too — most notably Clinton and Trump — might have participated in his abuse of girls. But because Epstein was able to keep all the details of his prosecution quiet, it’s impossible for the public to know exactly who else was involved in his crimes. By protecting himself, Epstein may have been able to protect his famous friends as well.

“Might has participated in the abuse of girls “is not proof of wrong-doing on the part of President Trump. This may be an attempt to implicate the President with weak circumstantial evidence in order to falsely blackmail Trump into not prosecuting the Clintons. Or, this President may actually be a pervert of the highest order?

The FBI Epstein’s deal, called a “non-prosecution agreement,” granted immunity to “any potential co-conspirators,” meaning that if any of Epstein’s powerful friends were involved in his crimes, they would face no consequences. And Acosta agreed that the deal would be kept secret from the victims, preventing them from showing up in court to try to challenge it.

The Epstein deal clearly protects the Clinton’s from prosecution over Epstein’s nefarious exploits involving 14 year old girls. However, one has to ask if the deal implicates Trump? Or, is Trump implicated by Clinton Foundation sources to prevent the President from acting against the Clintons. Or, is Trump’s failure to indict even one Deep State criminal compromised by his sordid past? After all, he did pay off a stripper to silence her from telling about her sexual encounter with the President. This begs the question, does the Deep state have the goods on President Trump? Why hasn’t this surfaced? The answer is clearly connected to the fact that Trump cannot be implicated without first implicating the Clintons and risk exposing the Deep State. I am extremely uncomfortable reporting these facts, but I am just following the data trail. Could the data trail between Trump and Epstein been fabricated by the Deep state to blackmail Trump into inactivity? Perhaps, but how did Epstein’s judge, Judge Acosta become the Secretary of Labor? That is a very disturbing development.

From the AP:

We know that Clinton is a pervert!

Records show that Bill Clinton flew to Epstein’s Island over two dozen times…

Again from Vox:

Clinton would go on to fly multiple times on Epstein’s private plane in 2002 and 2003, according to flight logs obtained by Gawker in 2015. Gawker also obtained and published Epstein’s address book, which included politicians, actors, and celebrities…

However a search for Trump’s travel records to Epstein’s Island produced nothing of value.

…Epstein’s plea deal, called a “non-prosecution agreement,” granted immunity to “any potential co-conspirators,” meaning that if any of Epstein’s powerful friends were involved in his crimes, they would face no consequences. And Judge Acosta agreed that the deal would be kept secret from the victims, preventing them from showing up in court to try to challenge it.

Both the Miami Herald and Vox both asserted that Epstein counted both Bill Clinton and Donald Trump as his friends. In a very damning piece of evidence, today, Epstein’s trial judge,  Judge Acosta, is now the Secretary of Labor for President Trump in what appears to a quid pro quo deal.

How many times has candidate and President Trump led crowds to chant “Lock her up, Lock her up”?  In Presidential Debate number two, Trump said he would lock Hillary up if he were elected. Maybe we know now Hillary has not been touched despite the fact that she represents very low-hanging fruit from a legal perspective since her email criminality was fully exposed by the FBI.

Is Donald Trump a compromised President? Is this why he has not moved on Hillary despite promises to do so? I don’t want to believe this but all I have done is to follow the evidence trail and there are some very disturbing findings that need a full explanation.  Well,  a more full explanation is provided below in what could be a massive cover-up of sex crimes against children in which both the Clintons’ and Trump.

 

More Evidence of a Cover-up

Zero Hedge was one of many outlets to report on the FBI’s recent actions which clearly constitute obstruction of justice. Why would the FBI, now clearly under the control of President Trump illegally raid the home of a Clinton Foundation whistleblower in violation of Federal law? It was illegal for the FBI to raid the home of a whistleblower. Is there evidence in the Uranium One Deal that implicates both the Clintons and Trump to Epstein? I am certain that this will be the next topic of investigation.

Also during the 2016 Presidential race, a woman going by the name Katie Johnson sued Trump, saying he had raped her at one of Epstein’s parties when she was 13, the Daily Beast reports. She later dropped the suit. This does not constitute proof of wrong-doing by Trump, but it certainly adds another log to this fire.

 Conclusion

The evidence against wrongdoing by the Clinton Foundation is strong and the implications that Bill Clinton benefited from the child sex trafficking exploits of Epstein and these funds were comingled in the Clinton Foundation are also strong. The evidence against Trump is weak, however, the appointment of Acosta to the Labor Secretary needs some explanation. I am left wondering if this is the next wave of charges that will be levied against the President. However, this exposes the Clintons as has been pointed out. May we live in interesting times.

Read More @ TheCommonSenseShow.com