Directed Energy Weapons (DEW)

0
1342

by Mark M., via The Burning Platform:

There are different types of directed energy weapons which include extremely low frequency (ELF), microwave, scalar, voice-to-skull, lasers and more (all these can be found on this site). This page will cover the attack in California and a few other places by way of fire created by directed energy weapons as this relates to Agenda 30 megaregions and the destruction of areas through weaponizing of weather with use of chemtrails and frequencies.

This page includes, but is not limited to, Lockheed Martin bragging about and demonstrating their directed energy weapons, a History Channel documentary on directed energy weapons, people’s footage of lasers in California the night the fires started and of the strange and unnatural aftermath of the fires. The videos people took of the laser matched the demonstrations given by Lockheed Martin and other official sources.

The news tried to give the impression that the over 100 fires (in 2017) that occurred all at once were from a forest fire spreading into neighborhoods. Yet, most of the trees didn’t burn and there is no burnt path between houses that are next to or across from each other. Notice in the picture on the left how that there was no burnt path between the two buildings and how that though both buildings were surrounded by trees, none of the trees got burnt or even singed. It is plain to see from this picture that a fire didn’t go from one building to the other, but that they were both attacked from above or inside. Also, the wind could not have been strong enough to blow an ember the distance of the two buildings as there aren’t even any ashes, leaves or broken branches on the ground. More pictures below.

The fires in California, Canada, Portugal, Tennessee and other places were nothing like normal wildfires. About 100 of them (in California in 2017) started at one time in the evening when it was cooler outside (yet the officials still blame it on climate change). Also, in many places, the fires burnt in straight lines and squares. Other anomalies are that the fires jumped from one house to another without touching the lawns in between the houses, burnt cement and metal, but not plastic or wood in some cases and burnt hardly any trees (even pine trees), but burnt structures and cars that were next to those trees. Also, despite the news reports of strong winds, the roads and sidewalks looked pristine as if someone swept them. As can be seen in videos below, the fires came from the sky as there were no burnt paths between the burnt structures. I am not saying that no trees burnt, but not the ones around the houses and buildings that were burnt. Is it possible that not all of the DEW attacks were at the same frequency?

If you take your time to go through all the videos, articles and documents on this page and consider that there have been no media reports of another country attacking us, (especially when they’ve been itching to drag Russia into a war with us); you will be hard-pressed to deny that it was the U.S. government who was behind it or at least complicit with it.. You’ll also see how that the United Nations already planned an Agenda 30 megaregiondevelopment zone in Santa Rosa before it was set to fire and that the areas being burnt match where the Agenda 30 megaregions map shows plans to build smart cities and no-people zones in the future. What better way to build a megaregion smart city than to first burn down all of what is already there? You can learn much about Agenda 30 on the Agenda 30 page of this site.

The evidence that the fires were a result of directed energy weapons (DEW), at least in part, is undeniably strong. There are also theories of smart meters or transformers blowing up being a cause. They might have contributed, (but that wouldn’t explain cars also being “toasted” with no burnt path between the house and the car), and the evidence that can be seen is that of directed energy weapons. It is not at all unfathomable that more than one weapon could have been used to ensure the desired effect. On September 11th, 2001; rescue workers being interviewed said they heard bombs go off when they were inside the twin towers and also Dr. Judy Wood, a former professor of engineering mechanics, gave a presentation filled with strong evidence that directed energy weapons were used on 9/11 as the building and all it’s contents dustified in mid-air and cars nearby looked toasted (video of her presentation included on this page). Why could bombs not have also been used in the foundation of the twin towers to work in conjunction with directed energy weapon from above? The very little debris that was left from the twin towers could have been the part that was not dustified by the DEW, but was left from an explosion.

I’ve heard the argument that trees don’t burn as easily because they are green (meaning have moisture in them) so therefore, don’t burn as easily as dry wood and you can prove this by trying to burn fresh wood in a stove or a campfire. Well, try putting a stucco roof tile, a chunk of cement block or part of a bathtub in a campfire to see how easily they burn as all these items were totally melted down or dustified in these house fires and I suggest that fresh wood would at least be singed. Also, this argument of trees being green hardly applies to pine tree needles and furthermore, because of the prolonged induced drought, (which is being blamed on climate change); most of the trees were dry. But, if we were to blame the quick spreading of the fires on everything being dry (as the news tries to imply), the grass and trees in between all the burnt structures would not have still been green. Dry grass was not even a factor in these fires spreading despite the news repeatedly saying “hot and dry conditions”. Something that may have caused the fires to burn more hot and spread so quickly is all the incendiary aluminum oxide that has been and continues to be sprayed over us by jets.

The news and other “official” sources keep touting that the fires are due to high heat and dryness due to climate change and high winds. The implication is that the earth got so hot that trees and grass caught on fire or that it is so dry that the fires spread across the grass and brush from one house to another even though the grass and brush between the burnt houses were still green and not even singed. As far as the earth being too warm, it would have to be at least 172 degrees as that is the temperature at which hay (which is dryer than grass) burns and between 190 – 260 degrees for wood depending on the type and condition of it. Furthermore, warmer weather should bring more rain as more water gets drawn from the ocean creating rain clouds. As for the dryness, you can find many videos from neverlosetruth, Dutchsinse, Weatherwars and others on Youtube showing how aerosols and frequencies were used in conjunction to keep rain off the coast of California.

Read More @ TheBurningPlatform.com