by BullionStar, Gold Seek:
Imagine a country in which banks hold virtually no cash at all. A country where if you walk into a bank branch, the clerk won’t be able to help you make a deposit. A country where there’s a good chance that if you grabbed a wad of cash and walked into an electronics store or a major nightclub, they wouldn’t be able to assist you in buying a new computer, nor get your drink on.
Welcome to Sweden, the land of virtual cashlessness! Although the Swedish Riksbank recently launched a full array of new and very colorful bills featuring celebrities such as famous children’s book author Astrid Lindgren and film director Ingmar Bergman, cash usage in Sweden is in absolute freefall, down from SEK 100 billion in 2010 to SEK 70 billion in 2015. Several factors combined has led to this development.
- Since many years, most Swedes above age 16 use a VISA, Master or Maestro debit card to settle payments, even for smaller sums below $10.
- Sweden is, and has for many years been, in the forefront in both developing and adapting new IT technology and early became one of the most mobile phone dense countries in the world, with upwards of 60% of the Swedish population owning a mobile phone as early as 1999.
- The Swedes willingness to adapt new technology is evident from the proliferation of a transfer system called ‘SWISH’. The SWISH app enables any two parties holding a Swedish bank account and a Swedish phone number to transfer money to each other instantly, with no fees. Even merchants use SWISH to accept payments. There are homeless people selling newspapers accepting payment via SWISH. In Stockholm, these homeless sellers have even been accepting credit card payments since as early as 2013 using a smartphone extension known as ‘iZettle’, also invented in Stockholm Sweden.
- During the last few years, more than 70% of all bank branches in Sweden has gone cashless, meaning that if you walk into a bank branch in Sweden, there’s about a 70% chance (or even higher) they won’t accept any cash you try to deposit.
- There are virtually no payments being made by cheques anylonger in Sweden as banks stopped issuing cheque books years ago.
Tech loving Swedes
Some of the facts listed might sound unbelievable and even absurd for someone not living in Sweden: No cash in the bank? Homeless people accepting credit card payments?
Yes, the Swedes seem extremely willing to accept new cashless payment technologies, such as credit/debit cards as well as payment apps, and forgo old ones, such as cash and cheques. All with little or no suspicion towards these new electronic payment methods.
Other countries have tried the same. Singapore tried, or at least planned to try a new electronic cash system named SELT or ‘Singapore Electronic Legal Tender’. In an OECD report issued in 2002, the Board of Commissioners of Currency (which was the sole currency issuing agency preceding the merger with MAS in 2002) outlined the envisioned structure of the SELT system where the goal was said to be reducing physical cash usage and its handling costs.
As can be read from the 2002 OECD report, the SELT system was in a very early conceptual stage and only outlined in very broad strokes. Interesting to note is that as early as 1998 the BCCS held a strategic planning seminar in which it set as its ‘corporate vision’ the introduction of SELT within 10 years.
The 2002 report further states that the SELT system was to be put in place in order to effectivize the cash currency system. The SELT system never came to fruition, and as is evident from the statistics displayed further down in this article, the amount of cash currency circulating in Singapore has increased immensely since 2002. As have the amount of cash ATM machines, where there were way less than 2000 units back then. The OECD report also mentions that although cash transaction costs in Singapore are extremely low, the cost to the economy was approximately SGD 656 million in 1998 and was projected to exceed SGD 1 billion by 2006.
The BCCS envisioning a system such as SELT 15 years ago shows they were ahead of their times and that Singapore government institutions are very early in trying to adopt new technologies and are eager to make their government institutions more effective to have a positive impact on the market economy of the nation. This goes in line with the Smart Nation Objectives that Singapore has outlined. In contrast to Sweden, the Singaporean approach have been to adapt new payment methods such as e.g. card payments, while still being extremely welcoming to older payment modes such as cash or even cheques. The very safe environment with extremely low violent crime rates makes Singapore a nation that lends itself well to cash payments.
However, as absurd as it might sound, the abolition of cash is slowly unfolding in many countries and Sweden is probably at the forefront of this trend. Although a majority of stores still accept payment in cash, there are an increasing number who don’t. Swedish law doesn’t require a merchant to accept payment in cash, which is a bit funny considering that cash is still legal tender in Sweden and legal tender normally means that what ever is legal tender should be good for the payment of all debts.
Now, if a merchant doesn’t want to accept ready cash, so be it. What is more shocking is that, as was mentioned at the beginning of this article, about 70-80% of all Swedish bank branches have removed all cash handling. All within just a few years time. No, it’s not a typo. Walk in to a random Swedish bank branch and try to deposit or withdraw a larger sum of cash and up to 80% of the time you’ll get rejected with a polite “sorry, but this branch doesn’t handle any cash”. These branches only provide services such as financial advising, housing loans, credit cards services etc. Most of it meant to get money out of your pocket and into the pockets of the banks’. Bank staff is pushed by it’s management to sell house loans, credit lines, speculative paper instruments, and more savings accounts. The aforementioned has been made evident in the extreme case of Wells Fargo’s latest banking scandal involving the concept of cross selling accounts with the goal of every Wells Fargo customer holding a minimum of eight accounts with them. Why? Because, in the words of former Wells Fargo’s Chairman John Stumpf : ‘Eight is great!’.
All this means that if you open an account at a Swedish bank branch, you can only fund your account by either going to a branch that does handle cash or by transferring money to the new account from an already existing account.
During the last 5-10 years in Sweden, M0, which is an aggregate measuring the amount of physical cash in an economy, has collapsed from over SEK 100 billion down to about SEK 70 billion.
In Singapore, cash money has increased from around SGD 21 billion in 2010 to SGD 33 billion in 2015.
More statistics from the World Bank shows us that the number for Automated Teller cash Machines has increased from less than 48 per 100K citizens, to more than 59 in 2014. And the trend seems to be a continued increase.
The above data means that there are now more than 3200 ATMs island wide in Singapore as compared to less than 2000 units in 2004.
Cashless means less crime!
One argument to making the economy totally cashless is that it would cripple crime. Crime syndicates, burglars, drug dealers, petty theives – they all rely on an anonymous paper cash system to sell their contraband. If we just eliminated cash paper bills, then drug dealing, robbery, burglary even tax fraud would almost totally disappear. Right?
One of the most avid proponents of a total cash ban is a famous Swedish musician by the name of Björn Ulvaeus. Ulvaeus, is known for being a member and founder of the super group ABBA (that ironically wrote the song “Money, money money”). A few years back, Ulvaeus’s son got burglarized several times and expensive music equipment was stolen from him. Ulvaeus’ reasoning behind banning cash is that if there where no cash at all, but only electronically traceable payment systems, the burglars wouldn’t be able to sell the stolen items on the black market, and as such, the theft would have never occurred.
Although slightly confused, Ulvaeus is still onto something. In two opinion articles published in mayor Swedish newspapers a few years ago, he mentions barter and its limitations.
History shows time and time again that humans have overcome the limitations of barter in numerous ingenious ways. Be it through using precious shells, stones or metals – such as gold and silver – or be it through local and informal credit systems, the challenges of barter has always been overcome as long as the need and demand for such a system exists.
For instance, cheques issued by the army and used by British soldiers stationed in Hong Kong in the 1950s, started to circulate as a cash currency. The faith and credit in these cheques amongst local merchants was universal, so why bother with the inconvenience of cashing them in when you could let your supplier do that instead. Anthropologist Keith Hart tells the story of his brother stationed in Hong Kong in the 1950s . Keith’s brother was more than a little surprised when he one day found a cheque signed by him 6 months earlier laying on the counter of a local bar with more than 40 different small signatures on the back stemming from each merchant legitimizing the validity of the cheque. A game of confidence. A spontaneously arisen form of cash.
In jails, alcohol, sticks of cigarettes and more recently ramen nodles, are being used as currency. These gods arise spontaneously as the universally most sought after and can thereby be used as currency or money to buy anything else. No government, army, police or bank was needed to give these goods the status of money. They emerged spontaneously in the market place just as gold and silver has done so many times in history before.
Is the banking system of today showing itself for what it really is: A pyramid scheme where your money is used to speculate in questionable asset classes who’s value is propped up only by the very investors (the banks) that are buying into these asset classes with the help of money emanating from an endless pool of credit fueled by the central banks’ artificially low or even negative interest rates?
Negative interest rates and cashless society: A precursor to hyperinflation?
When the negative interest rates of the central banks spreads to the commercial banks, a lot of people will want to withdraw their money. As long as cash is readily available, this is not an issue. At least not as long as not everyone decides to withdraw all at once. But if cash use is highly limited, as in the given example with Sweden, withdrawing your money will be hard or impossible. A cashless or ‘cash strapped’ society is effectively hindering a bank run to happen, as this in reality gives the banks a debt cancellation or at least a massive debt forgiveness, because remember, the balance on your account is the banks debt to you. If there’s no cash, then how can the bank pay its debt to you?