by Joseph P. Farrell, Giza Death Star:
(Recently during a private conversion, Ms. K.M. shared a hypothesis about the “Russian collusion” meme that the hysterical western media keeps shouting. I have to be honest and say that I never bought into the whole narrative because I just didn’t see the point: after all, if one can sell uranium to Russia, why can’t members of one’s staff talk to them? But the “Russia collusion” narrative keeps droning on (and on and on and…). During our conversation, K.M. said that there was possibly a much deeper level to this, one that few were looking at, a cultural level and even a geopolitical one dating back to the American War Between the States. After listening, I asked her to share the thoughts in a blog, and the following is the result. I have to say, on this “deep analysis”, I think that the core hypothesis is spot on, and indeed, I suspect that if one carefully examined the speeches of Mr. Putin and Mr. Trump, one would find agreement on a number of core “anti-globalist” propositions.)
In Russia, during the Stalin era, a bargain was eventually struck between the Russian Christian churches and the government: the Russian Christians could keep their culture alive. And importantly, Christian clergy would required to quietly serve in the KGB. They needed each other to a certain degree. After the Soviet Union melted away and a vast power vacuum developed, the Atlanticists came in to asset strip the world’s largest country, causing millions Russians to die – according to some esitimates, twenty percent of their population at the time. In other words, some of the same people who want to bring you globalism while strumming and singing Kumbaya set up the circumstances where twenty-million people in the 1990’s perished for profit.
In the middle of all this, a core contingent of Russian nationalists in the KGB apparently banded together and with the blessing of then President Boris Yeltsin, promoted Mr. Putin to run the Russian Federation. With the Communists out of power and ideas, and knowing that the rape of Russia by the West had to be stopped, Mr. Putin and those behind and around him instituted a set of programs and operations to regenerate the country.
To replace the now defunct Leninism (I think he is still un-rotting away in his tomb at the Kremlin), the Russian government has turned back to its cultural roots in Eastern Orthodoxy, trying to fill a spiritual void left empty after 70 years of Communism and ten years of abuse by elements in the West. Since then, 25,000 churches have been built or restored in Russia.
In the eighteen years since the faction behind Mr. Putin came to power, the country has been transformed in a way that Western Neo-liberalism would call “regressive.” The government and its leaders there speak plainly about the need for morality and virtue (much stronger terms than “ethics” and “principles”). They speak plainly about the need for thriving families and communities. They have mostly practiced a kind of restraint that in fact appears to be quite the opposite to what the spaghetti-western propaganda media would tell you. In the state of the union address in 2013, Mr. Putin said (as reported in the Telegraph):
“This destruction of traditional values from above not only entails negative consequences for society, but is also inherently anti-democratic because it is based on an abstract notion and runs counter to the will of the majority of people,” Mr Putin said, adding there could be no benefit for society for treating “good and evil” equally.
In his 70-minute televised speech from an ornate Kremlin hall, Mr Putin said traditional family values where a bulwark against “so-called tolerance – genderless and infertile.”
An article in The National Interest underscores the point:
“…in today’s Russia the Orthodox Church is closely partnered with the state. It provides both intellectual and moral support to many state policies, not because it has to, but because it wants to. The current moral framework of Russian foreign policy is, indeed, its view, which the Church promotes because it is convinced that creating a “congenial international order” will assist it in its threefold salvific mission—to save individual souls, to save all national cultures that have been baptized into Christ, and to save all mankind. Needless to say, this is as far from the doctrine of separation of Church and State as East is from West.”
Since Mr. Trump has come to power, he has moved a great distance closer to Christianity than expected. His wife, on his first trip after he took office, read (video:) The Lord’s Prayer before he spoke. He picked Pentecostal Christian Mike Pence as his running mate, held an anti-abortion vigil on the White House lawn, reportedly prays every morning with the team in the oval office, attacks the base content of Hollywood media elites and calls out the so-called “perverts.” On CBN in 2015, he said:
“…As you know, I am Protestant. I am Presbyterian. Most people don’t know that. They have no idea. I’m proud of it… One of the things I learned this weekend being in Iowa, I met with a lot of national security experts and everything else, that if you’re a Christian living in Syria you can’t come into this country. Yet, if you are a Muslim living in Syria, who are not under attack, they can come in. But we have Christians being beheaded all over the world by ISIS. In Syria and in Iraq, in particular, those Christians can’t come into this country. You say what you want but this is really something. That’s a lack of respect for us…If you are from Europe and you’re a Christian you can’t come in…meaning it’s almost impossible. So you tell me about religious liberty and freedom. The Christians are being treated horribly because we have nobody to represent the Christians. Believe me, if I run and I win, I will be the greatest representative of the Christians they’ve had in a long time.”