by Peter Schiff, SchiffGold:
The US national debt stands at over $21 trillion and neither political party in Washington D.C. seems inclined to do anything about it. In fact, the GOP tax plan winding its way through the political process will add an estimated $1.5 trillion more to the debt over the next decade. And that doesn’t even account for the increases in spending that Congress will certainly approve over that timespan.
Of course, all of this government debt has serious ramifications. Corporations are also piling on credit. Last month, Mint Capital strategist Bill Blain predicted that “the great crash of 2018 is going to start in the deeper, darker depths of the credit market.”
Now consider this. China has an even bigger debt problem than the US, and analysts say it could threaten global financial security.
Jim Rickards recently listed a Chinese debt crisis as one of the possible snowflakes that could set off the next financial avalanche. As if on cue, the mainstream has picked up this narrative. As Business Insider reports it:
China’s ballooning levels of debt and dependency on credit to fuel growth continues to pose a major financial stability threat to the global economy, and could be the catalyst for the next crisis, according to the International Monetary Fund.”
The IMF recently completed a fact-finding mission to China. According to the international body, credit growth has outpaced GDP growth, creating a large “credit overhang.”
The credit-to-GDP ratio is now about 25% above the long-term trend, very high by international standards and consistent with a high probability of financial distress. As a result, corporate debt has reached 165% of GDP, and household debt, while still low, has risen by 15 percentage points of GDP over the past five years and is increasingly linked to asset-price speculation. The buildup of credit in traditional sectors has gone hand-in-hand with a slowdown of productivity growth and pressures on asset quality.”
The IMF listed three areas of “tension” this pileup of debt has created in the Chinese financial sector.
First, expansionary monetary and fiscal policy aimed at supporting employment and growth (sound familiar?) has led both national and local Chinese governments to provide huge incentives to keep failing companies afloat. Rickards said he saw the impact of this on his visit to China.
I was out in the countryside south of Nanjing not too long ago, visiting some of China’s famous ghost cities. I was with some Communist Party officials and provincial officials who were behind it all. Everything I saw, construction as far as the eye can see, magnificent in scope, was all empty. I’ve seen it firsthand. I turned to one of these officials and said, ‘This is all debt finance. This is all empty, so you have no revenue to pay the debt. So how are you gonna pay the debt?’ And he said, ‘Oh, we can’t. But Beijing’s going to bail us out.’ Not we hope Beijing will bail us out — but Beijing will bail us out. That isn’t an isolated viewpoint. It’s widespread.”
Second, “risky lending” has moved from banks toward “less supervised parts of the financial system.” As the IMF put it, Chinese investors are looking for increasingly complex ways to increase yields, which has led to “regulatory arbitrage and the growth of increasingly complex investment vehicles.”
Third, “widespread implicit guarantees have added to these risks.” According to the IMF, Chinese financial institutions seem unwilling to allow investors to lose money. This encourages even more risk-taking. They don’t see any downside.
A reluctance among financial institutions to allow retail investors to take losses; the expectation that the government stands behind debt issued by state-owned enterprises and local government financing vehicles; efforts to stabilize stock and bond markets in times of volatility; and protection funds for various financial institutions, have all contributed to moral hazard and excessive risk-taking.”
Read More @ SchiffGold.com