by Dane Wigington, Geoenginnering Watch:
All official sources are blaming the increasingly extreme and deadly wildfire behavior on global warming alone, but is that the full truth? What are “official sources” not telling us about the increasingly destructive wildfires? Illegal global climate engineering / solar radiation management operations are a primary causal factor that is fueling catastrophic wildfires all over the globe. Climate engineering is completely disrupting the hydrological cycle, triggering increasing dry lightning, destroying the ozone layer, contaminating soils, and covering everything at ground level with an incendiary dust (due to the fallout from atmosphere spraying programs). The new 10 minute video below elaborates on the direct effect geoengineering operations are having on forest fires, their behavior and their frequency.
The satellite animation below was recorded on October 11th, it is important to examine carefully. Anomalous, counter-directional and extreme wind patterns over the core wildfire region have been a major contributing factor in the unfolding firestorm cataclysm in California. All official sources continue to ignore and omit any discussion of the ongoing illegal climate engineering operations.
All of us must work together in the effort to fully expose and halt the ongoing climate engineering / weather warfare assault. How? By circulating credible data from a credible source. Make your voice heard in this all important battle. – DW
The commentary below was added to this “Geoengineering Is Fueling Firestorm Catastrophes” post in response to many narratives and conclusions that are being circulated about the creation and / or causes of the recent and ongoing catastrophic California firestorms.
How do we expose and halt the catastrophic global climate engineering assault? We need to stand on solid verifiable ground in regard to the data and conclusions we share, or we will lose all credibility in this most important battle for the greater good. We must not give into and indulge in implausible speculation that by its very nature provokes disbelief and can only weaken our strategic position as we expose the very real and terrible crimes being perpetrated against our scarred planet. Did the recent California fires burn incredibly hot? Yes. Even in unprecedented ways? Yes. Are there reasons to think foul play is at the core of these firestorm disasters? Yes. Does available data make clear that climate engineering in countless ways set the stage for the firestorm nightmares? Without question. (FYI http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/geoengineering-is-fueling-firestorm-catastrophes/)
All this being said, in regard to the recent California firestorms there are a great many baseless claims circulating on the internet that should cause us all to take immediate pause. These narratives include the suggestion that everything from laser beams to military incendiary bombs were used to cause/create the recent catastrophic fires. Though laser and directed energy weapons do exist in some forms (https://www.airforcetimes.com/news/your-air-force/2016/06/25/air-force-has-directed-energy-weapons-now-comes-the-hard-part/) ,there is no documentation whatsoever to confirm any sky to ground laser / directed energy platform is even remotely capable of causing massive and instant vaporization of countless structures over vast expanses. If such instant and extreme destruction were to occur (from massive laser / energy beams, spiraling down from the sky in the middle of the night), wouldn’t they have been seen by many? If such instant destruction technology does exist, and was used, why is there so much film footage of extreme wind driven flames over the entire night? Even if “directed energy” weapons of this caliber existed, and were used, CAL FIRE and thousands of residents would also have to be a part of such a coverup (which is completely implausible). Again,” laser / directed energy beams” (if a technology for such sky to ground decimation even exists) during the night when the California fires ignited would be extremely visible. Though some have referred to technology (that does exist) for extremely powerful laser and plasma beams, the “trillion watt laser” emission can only be produced from a ground bases source with access to extreme levels of power. Any such powerful emission could not be produced from an overflying aircraft or a satellite. Even a flying full scale massive electrical power plant could not even begin to produce such an emission. And consider this, the trillion watt laser beams (that have been created under test conditions in ground facilities) only existed for a billionth of a second, and was only 2 millimeters wide, thats it. We must remember and consider that the California wind driven firestorms raged for days over extensive areas.
We must also stop to consider all the converging factors that fueled the firestorm cataclysm. Record low fuel moisture content (directly connected to climate engineering). Near hurricane force winds (directly connected to climate engineering). Accumulated incendiary dust not only laying on the surface of everything, but blowing in the wind (directly connected to climate engineering). About the trees that are still standing in many photos, many of these trees are Redwoods (common in the Santa Rosa region) which are extremely fire resistant. All should take the time to look up more information on this, here is one sample link, FYI http://forestschoolsbapet.blogspot.com/2013/04/redwoods-and-why-are-they-fireproof.html
Redwood trees have very thick bark which has a lot of water inside it. They also DO NOT have any pitch inside the trunks which is a very flammable substance found in many other trees. Another factor that helps to make the redwood trees fireproof is the fact that they do not have any of the resins that other trees like pine and the sap that the tree contains is made up of a majority of water also adding to the fireproofing ability.
Other species of living and green trees would also not burn in the same manner as dried and fully dried and cured building materials, not at all. Any that have ever tried to burn a completely green log in a fire will know this. Such a piece of “fuel” will not burn, the moisture is too impregnated in it. Ever put a paper cup filled with water in a fire? It, also, will not burn until the water boils out. The top of the cup burns down in pace with the water boiling out. Though the crowns of many pine species are, of course, highly combustible, the trunks and heavy branches are not (assuming the tree was alive when exposed to fire).
Back to the extreme wind in these fires, like a bellows (or blower) for a forge, such extreme winds can rapidly increase combustion and thus temperatures. Such extreme winds also scatter embers at unimaginable speed onto landscapes, into attics, eaves, etc, where the embers are fanned by the high winds into further combustion. Many older homes are built with extremely flammable materials, and many even with wood sub-floors which provide even more fuel at the critical base of dwelling fires. Once subfloors have been burnt away, it could provide a cavity for some larger incombustible materials to fall into (such as porcelain sinks and toilets which extreme heat can also shatter).
Structure fires are much hotter and burn longer than a forest fire, and in many cases, what you find is a single home ignites and then like dominos falling other homes catch on fire. This is exactly what is occurred in California communities like Santa Rosa.
As homes in close proximity ignite, all of the natural gas and / or propane supplied to homes adds further fuel to the wind blown furnace flames. Once fully ablaze, one home can ignite those immediately adjacent to it from the radiant heat alone. Homes across a street could be far enough away to be spared. Also, in scenarios where one home was in ashes next to another that did not burn, fire crews may have been present and actively watering down homes that had not yet ignited. Again, some next to other homes that were fully ablaze.
I viewed one video that showed the a tree that was burning from the inside out, with some claiming this was proof of a laser weapon. This, also, is verifiably false. I have personally witnessed this exact scenario many times over years of controlled burns on my own habitat reserve land, and fighting wildfires that have occurred with staggering frequency on and near my acreage on the east side of Lake Shasta.. Any ember that settles into a hollowed out and decaying tree trunk will start such a fire as the one in a tree that was featured in the video claiming laser weapons were used. I have seen decaying trees that had a hole or crack at the base of the trunk which allowed air in, and embers. Once the rotted core ignited, the tree literally looked like a blow torch with flames shooting out from the top. About the wind blown fire scenario, again, if and when the heat plum from a fire is blowing along at ground level, combustibles one side or another may not be very effected from the directional flow of flames and heat that is being pushed in a particular direction due to the powerful winds. I am speaking from personal experience, not from speculation.
Some videos claimed brick or rock walls on some sides of some homes had disappeared, all of the “before and after” photos I have seen of this showed veneer walls of brick or rock, not walls that were actually constructed of these materials. Some of the same circulating videos claim that glass or aluminum could not melt in a wildfire, also false. Anyone that has ever put bottle into a hot camp fire and left it in the core of the coals all night knows better. The same with an aluminum can. And, again, to be clear, all the factors I mentioned in this report must be remembered. Yes, these fires are unprecedented, the heat and behavior is unprecedented, geoengineering is inarguably a major factor that set the stage, and arson is likely. The fires ignited in the worse possible locations at the worst possible times. Coincidence? Not likely. Do these fires serve many agendas of those in power? Yes, absolutely, but we must still stand on solid ground with the data and conclusions we share with any breaking news story if we are to retain credibility.
I know many people who are now claiming no one died (and no one was injured) in Las Vegas, claiming that it was all staged. This narrative is also very harmful to the cause of credibility, insisting on the truth. I have a long term friendship with a former Green Beret who just lost two close colleagues in Las Vegas. Though the Las Vegas event also has countless unanswered questions, and appears to be anything but what official sources are telling us, people were injured and died. The notion that thousands of people, including emergency workers and hospitals, could all be in on some grand conspiracy theater, is not rational. Are we to believe that 9/11 was only a staged slaughter? That people did not die there? Let’s all remember that those in power do not care how many they kill (collateral damage) to accomplish their agenda. Are we to believe the power structure would go to unimaginable lengths to avoid killing anyone in the Las Vegas event? Such a conclusion is also not rational given what we know about the demeanor of those in power. Many of the sites and sources pushing the ” laser beams / directed energy beams” created the fires” false narrative are also propagating the “Flat Earth” and “global warming is a hoax” false and highly discrediting narratives. In the case of the “global warming is a hoax” disinformation, this is in fact exactly the false narrative that the power structure and the geoengineers want. Why would anyone who claims to be fighting climate engineering / geoengineering push this kind of disinformation?
There is also the false and completely undocumented claim reporting “water vapor machines” are producing all the moisture for storms. Again, this narrative is verifiably absurd. http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/cooling-towers-climate-engineering-is-there-a-connection/
Credibility is so very critical in the fight for the greater good. Logic, reason, and due diligence investigation must be a part of the equation, or hard earned credibility is completely sacrificed. The truth is more than alarming enough, we must make every effort to stand on solid and factual ground. Credibility is extremely difficult to earn, and so very easy to lose.