# The Flat Earth “Psyop” ?

55
1824

from SGT Report:

Read it and feel free to share your thoughts (respectfully) on the subject in the comments below.

Here’s the email:

Sean, It was hard for me to wrap my head around flat earth at first also…

But TRUTH resonates and if it hasn’t resonated with you yet, it is because you have not been critical enough… you are letting their mind control influence you.

I beg you to watch the 2 or 3 videos I sent you.

Unfortunately you need to pick a camp on this one. It is too important not to and the only way is to give yourself a full day of research. That is all it will take. Put the pedos on hold. We can take them all down with this truth!!!

Explain this:

1. Go on Google images and pull up “photos” of the earth… ALL without exception are CGI or paintings!!! Many images are clearly Photoshopped:

Why??? Don’t you think Hubble would have taken at least ONE photo since it was put up (of course Hubble does not exist… all Hubble “photos” are also all CGI !!! )

2- Also not one of the 25’000 satellites are ever seen in any earth “photos”!!!!

3. if Earth is spinning 1000miles/hr around itself, 67’000 miles/hr around the sun and our whole galaxy traveling 670’000miles/ hr around the milky way galaxy, the night sky would be constantly changing ! The stars should be moving in all directions, forever changing as we hurl through space… and yet… we see the same stars every night since the beginning of time rotating in perfect circles around the north star… as they ALWAYS have!!!!

Time lapsed photography…

4. If the earth were round, using the mathematical equation to calculate curvature…not only would anything 40 miles away be over 800ft below the horizon, but IF we could see it, it would be seen tilting away from us. The tower in the video you sent me is a good example. Point is we should not have seen it at all. True the bottom was obscured by “Mirage” but it was straight up and down and not leaning away from the viewer as it should have!!!! THIS IS PROOF!!!

5- If the “planet earth” was larger than they are telling us as you suggest, it would not change physics. Did you realize that absolutely no correction for curvature exists for road or train track construction?

Architects & Engineers for Flat Earth Truth

Surveyors, engineers and architects are never required to factor the supposed curvature of the Earth into their projects, providing another proof the world is a plane, not a planet. Canals and railways, for example, are always cut and laid horizontally, often over hundreds of miles, without any allowance for curvature.

One surveyor, Mr. T. Westwood, wrote into the January, 1896 “Earth Review” magazine stating that, “In leveling, I work from Ordinance marks, or canal levels, to get the height above sea level. The puzzle to me used to be, that over several miles each level was and is treated throughout its whole length as the same level from end to end; not the least allowance being made for curvature. One of the civil engineers in this district, after some amount of argument on each side as to the reason why no allowance for curvature was made, said he did not believe anybody would know the shape of the earth in this life.”

Another Surveyor and Engineer of thirty years wrote to the Birmingham Weekly Mercury, Feb. 15th, 1890 stating, “I am thoroughly acquainted with the theory and practice of civil engineering. However bigoted some of our professors may be in the theory of surveying according to the prescribed rules, yet it is well known amongst us that such theoretical measurements are INCAPABLE OF ANY PRACTICAL ILLUSTRATION. All our locomotives are designed to run on what may be regarded as TRUE LEVELS or FLATS. There are, of course, partial inclines or gradients here and there, but they are always accurately defined and must be carefully traversed. But anything approaching to eight inches in the mile, increasing as the square of the distance, COULD NOT BE WORKED BY ANY ENGINE THAT WAS EVER YET CONSTRUCTED.

Taking one station with another all over England and Scotland, it may be stated that all the platforms are ON THE SAME RELATIVE LEVEL. The distance between Eastern and Western coasts of England may be set down as 300 miles. If the prescribed curvature was indeed as represented, the central stations at Rugby or Warwick ought to be close upon three miles higher than a chord drawn from the two extremities. If such was the case there is not a driver or stoker within the Kingdom that would be found to take charge of the train. We can only laugh at those of your readers who seriously give us credit for such venturesome exploits, as running trains round spherical curves. Horizontal curves on levels are dangerous enough, vertical curves would be a thousand times worse, and with our rolling stock constructed as at present physically impossible.”

Engineer, W. Winckler, wrote into the Earth Review October 1893 regarding the Earth’s supposed curvature, stating, “As an engineer of many years standing, I saw that this absurd allowance is only permitted in school books. No engineer would dream of allowing anything of the kind. I have projected many miles of railways and many more of canals and the allowance has not even been thought of, much less allowed for. This allowance for curvature means this – that it is 8” for the first mile of a canal, and increasing at the ratio by the square of the distance in miles; thus a small navigable canal for boats, say 30 miles long, will have, by the above rule an allowance for curvature of 600 feet. Think of that and then please credit engineers as not being quite such fools. Nothing of the sort is allowed. We no more think of allowing 600 feet for a line of 30 miles of railway or canal, than of wasting our time trying to square the circle”

The Suez Canal which connects the Mediterranean Sea with the Gulf of Suez on the Red Sea is a clear proof of the Earth’s and water’s non-convexity. The canal is 100 miles long and without any locks so the water within is an uninterrupted continuation of the Mediterranean Sea to the Red Sea. When it was constructed, the Earth’s supposed curvature was not taken into account, it was dug along a horizontal datum line 26 feet below sea-level, passing through several lakes from one sea to the other, with the datum line and the water’s surface running perfectly parallel over the 100 miles. The average level of the Mediterranean is 6 inches above the Red Sea, while the floodtides in the Red Sea rise 4 feet above the highest and drop 3 feet below the lowest in the Mediterranean, making the half-tide level of the Red Sea, the surface of the Mediterranean Sea, and the 100 miles of water in the canal, all a clear continuation of the same horizontal line! Were they instead the supposed curved line of globe-Earthers, the water in the center of the canal would be 1666 feet (502 x 8 inches = 1666 feet 8 inches) above the respective Seas on either side!

The distance between the Red Sea at Suez and the Mediterranean Sea is 100 statute miles, the datum line of the Canal being 26 feet below the level of the Mediterranean, and is continued horizontally the whole way from sea to sea, there not being a single lock on the Canal, the surface of the water being parallel with the datum line. It is thus clear that there is no curvature or globularity for the whole hundred miles between the Mediterranean and the Red Sea; had there been, according to the Astronomic theory, the middle of the Canal would have been 1,666 feet higher than at either end, whereas the Canal is perfectly horizontal for the whole distance. The Great Canal of China, said to be 700 miles in length, was made without regard to any allowance for supposed curvature, as the Chinese believe the Earth to be a Stationary Plane. I may also add that no allowance was made for it in the North Sea Canal, or in the Manchester Ship Canal, both recently constructed, thus clearly proving that there is no globularity in Earth or Sea, so that the world cannot possibly be a Planet.” -David Wardlaw Scott, “Terra Firma” (134)

If the earth be the globe of popular belief, it is very evident that in cutting a canal, an allowance must be made for the curvature of the globe, which allowance would correspond to the square of the distance multiplied by eight inches. From The Age, of 5th August 1892, I extract the following: ‘The German Emperor performed the ceremony of opening the Gates of the Baltic and North Sea Canal, in the spring of 1891. The canal starts at Holtenau, on the south side of Kiel Bay, and joins the Elbe 15 miles above its mouth. It is 61 miles long, 200 feet wide at the surface and 85 feet at the bottom, the depth being 28 feet. No locks are required, as the surface of the two seas is level.’ Let those who believe it is the practice for surveyors to make allowance for ‘curvature’ ponder over the following from the Manchester Ship Canal Company (Earth Review, October, 1893) ‘It is customary in Railway and Canal constructions for all levels to be referred to a datum which is nominally horizontal and is so shown on all sections. It is not the practice in laying out Public Works to make allowances for the curvature of the earth.” -Thomas Winship, “Zetetic Cosmogeny” (23)

The London and Northwestern Railway forms a straight line 180 miles long between London and Liverpool. The railroad’s highest point, midway at Birmingham station, is only 240 feet above sea-level. If the world were actually a globe, however, curveting 8 inches per mile squared, the 180 mile stretch of rail would form an arc with the center point at Birmingham raising a full 5,400 feet above London and Liverpool. Adding the station’s actual height (240 feet) to its theoretical inclination (5,400 feet) gives 5,640 feet as the rail’s necessary height on a globe-Earth, more than a thousand feet taller than Ben Nevis, the tallest mountain in Great Britain!

In projecting railways on a globe, the datum line would be the arc of a circle corresponding to the latitude of the place. That the datum line for the railway projections is always a horizontal line, proves that the general configuration of the world is horizontal. To support the globe theory, the gentlemen of the observatories should call upon the surveyor to prove that he allows the necessary amount for ‘curvature.’ But this is what the learned men dare not do, as it is well-known that the allowance for the supposed curvature is never made.” -Thomas Winship, “Zetetic Cosmogeny” (107)

In a long line, like that of the Great Pacific Railway, extending across North America, the supposed curvature would, of course, be proportionately great, extending to many miles in height, but not one inch was allowed by the engineers for curvature during the whole course of the construction of that vast line of Railway. And, if we think of it, how could it be otherwise? All Railway metals must, of necessity, be straight, for how could any engine or carriage run with safety on a convex surface?” -David Wardlaw Scott, “Terra Firma” (125)

J.C. Bourne in his book, “The History of the Great Western Railway” stated that the entire original English railroad, more than 118 miles long, that the whole line with the exception of the inclined planes, may be regarded practically as level. The British Parliament Session in 1862 that approved its construction recorded in Order No. 44 for the proposed railway, “That the section be drawn to the same HORIZONTAL scale as the plan, and to a vertical scale of not less than one inch to every one hundred feet, and shall show the surface of the ground marked on the plan, the intended level of the proposed work, the height of every embankment, and the depth of every cutting, and a DATUM HORIZONTAL LINE which shall be the same throughout the whole length of the work.”

One hundred and eighteen miles of LEVEL railway, and yet the surface on which it is projected a globe? Impossible. It cannot be. Early in 1898 I met Mr. Hughes, chief officer of the steamer ‘City of Lincoln.’ This gentleman told me he had projected thousands of miles of level railway in South America, and never heard of any allowance for curvature being made. On one occasion he surveyed over one thousand miles of railway which was a perfect straight line all the way. It is well known that in the Argentine Republic and other parts of South America, there are railways thousands of miles long without curve or gradient. In projecting railways, the world is acknowledged to be a plane, and if it were a globe the rules of projection have yet to be discovered. Level railways prove a level world, to the utter confusion of the globular school of impractical men with high salaries and little brains.” -Thomas Winship, “Zetetic Cosmogeny” (109)

That in all surveys no allowance is made for curvature, which would be a necessity on a globe; that a horizontal line is in every case the datum line, the same line being continuous throughout the whole length of the work; and that the theodolite cuts a line at equal altitudes on either side of it, which altitude is the same as that of the instrument, clearly proves, to those who will accept proof when it is furnished, that the world is a plane and not a globe.” -Thomas Winship, “Zetetic Cosmogeny” (126)

PLEASE SEAN, WE’RE COUNTING ON YOU!

WITH THIS INFO, WE CAN CRUSH THE SATANIC PEDOPHILES ONCE AND FOR ALL!!!

GOD BLESS YOU AND GIVE YOU THE COURAGE TO SEE THIS TRUTH!!!

God created the earth for MAN. We are not a speck of dust, a mistake flying through space by accident!

We are his children and HE built this beautiful terrarium for US… to have a physical experience and learn HIS lessons!

Let us not LET HIM DOWN. HE IS THE ONE SHOWING US THE TRUTH ABOUT THE PEDOS AND FLAT EARTH.

It’s all a lie… THE BIGGEST LIE!!!

Love and light,
A

1. Sorry Sean, Did not see the video but I will share this; I have seen the curvature of the Earth, I have observed planets, and on more than 1 occasion, I have noticed the regularity of the Sun rising and setting. Have also noticed the orb shapes of water, welding splash being throw, as well as volcanic splash. Nature is loaded with examples and somehow the Earth gets to be flat? Not seeing it my friend.

• Have you also observed the Earth spinning at 1000mph, does the atmosphere spin with the Earth? what height does the atmosphere stop spinning? How do you fly an airplane against the spin of the atmosphere and get anywhere?
I have observed flickering lights in the sky also wandering stars i guess, SO WHAT, what does that prove?

2. I have not seen anything to convince me of the flat earth theory. The photoshopping, CGI, and paintings could be cover for any number of nefarious purposes. And according to the precession of the equinox, the stars in the sky change over thousands of years based on the earth’s wobble. Don’t see what any of this has to do with the pedo network other than keeping us distracted.
Watched this last night. Pretty interesting.

• At least you believe that satellites and space travel “are real”. Too bad you don’t believe your comment or this website “are real”.

• As I clearly stated above, “I have thought from day one that the entire ‘flat earth’ subject was a psyop, even telling former SGT Report contributor Rory to please refrain from posting material about it on this site. But again, Marty’s video was very thought provoking.”
No sense seething with hate over this folks, I have not gone off the deep end. It’s just a conversation. Like Marty Leeds’ video (which I linked to), the quotes from the engineers who have built the railroads and canals were also thought provoking. That’s all. The official 24,901 mile circumference of the earth is very small. Based on what we can observe (flat planes spanning hundreds of miles), questions are being asked. No sense discussing here though. You can wipe the foam from your mouths now.

• To be clear, I am not a “flat earther” nor and I stupid person. I am however, intellectually curious AND I know that the ruling elite have been LYING to us about the nature of everything, including the theoretical “Big Bang”, since the beginning of time. I simply find quotes like this one thought provoking:
Engineer, W. Winckler, wrote into the Earth Review October 1893 regarding the Earth’s supposed curvature, stating, “As an engineer of many years standing, I saw that this absurd allowance is only permitted in school books. No engineer would dream of allowing anything of the kind. I have projected many miles of railways and many more of canals and the allowance has not even been thought of, much less allowed for. This allowance for curvature means this – that it is 8” for the first mile of a canal, and increasing at the ratio by the square of the distance in miles; thus a small navigable canal for boats, say 30 miles long, will have, by the above rule an allowance for curvature of 600 feet. Think of that and then please credit engineers as not being quite such fools. Nothing of the sort is allowed. We no more think of allowing 600 feet for a line of 30 miles of railway or canal, than of wasting our time trying to square the circle”

3. I think that I’ll grab a good pair of binoculars, run up to the top of Space Needle, and take a look at Russia.
Really? SGT Report is running this drivel?

• That might have been asking a lot considering most people have a very short attention span.
The part on the Suez canal was pretty intriguing.

• Or not willing to waste precious time wading through nonsense produced by some who-knows-who that is trying to explain a complicated universe to themselves (and get others to go along) while lacking a core understanding of physics and nature.
I have watched enough similar videos to recognize their lack of science and common sense.

I think much of the flat earth idea stems from a biblical / Christian belief system. I don’t knock Christians because I was raised as one myself and believe deeply in the message Jesus brought to mankind, but if at a persons intellectual core is the idea that everything is subjective and open to change “at Gods will”, securing a coherent and stable understanding of anything in this world is impossible.

Today, as the foundation of our civilization rumbles, as our core institutions fail and we lose trust in our leadership, it is understandable that people could lose trust in the academic teaching that that civilization is based on, but we should not lose sight of a millennium of scientific study and advancement of the human understanding of the world over an ill prepared, badly presented internet meme.

There is no plot to conceal the true physical nature of this planet from its inhabitants. Yes, there are lies and overt scientific activities meant to control us and change our world, but there is no need for such a lie as the “flat earth”. Most people are incurious and malleable enough to control without such a difficult lie to support.

There is certainly a universe of understanding yet to be gained by us through science, study and meditation, but we must not allow ourselves to regress into primitive thinking.

• Obama used the “Flat Earth” strawman in numerous speeches, comparing them to climate change “deniers”. There’s a reason for that and he knows full well who pulls the Flat Earth crowd’s strings.

• This BS has been going on for so long now that anyone who doesn’t know the answer doesn’t want to know. It is relatively easy to work it out for yourself just by considering the time zones. How can the sun be setting and rising at the same time in different places if the earth is flat? Call someone in another time zone when you see the sun setting and ask them what the sun is doing. Work the rest out for yourself.

• I don’t think the “Flat Earth” disinfo crap has had the destructive power TPTB had hoped for (on the truth movement). It still makes minor appearances here and there before being booed offstage though. IMHO it’s still time to take it out behind the barn though and put it out of its misery.

• Don’t let some of these comments get you down. Brainwashing is a very powerful force and when combined with sheep mentality it is almost impossible to break through, even when you show them actual proof. As you can see the comments are just opinions. But….when you do the math, the truth is revealed because Math Does Not Lie.

• “Brainwashing is a very powerful force and when combined with sheep mentality it is almost impossible to break through, even when you show them actual proof.”
Hmm, sounds exactly like religious beliefs.

• Exactly just like the new “science” which is really Pseudo Science .. when i went to school science was observable, testable, repeatable, that is REAL science making up stories about the past is not science it is Religion just like you say radwg

4. Deep State & Flat Earth didn’t they do the theme song for the Beverly Hillbillies ? Or were they the group that wrote , A man has to stand for something or he’ll fall for any thing . Or is this a course name for “advanced study” at your local public high school ?

5. Dear Lord, not this bullshit psyop! Pls don’t fall for this nonsense, or else you’re in danger of losing some Patreon supporters.

6. It is a psyop Sean. Please don’t you of all people fall for it.This flat earth nonsense is to discredit the truth movement.
Look how it’s set up to discredit architects and engineers for truth.

Majellan found out half a millennium ago that the world is round.

• LOL true words PJB. Was hoping some people were starting to grasp cryptos? Nope, it’s back to the 15th Century to re-settle the settled we go. Next stop… the Pleistocene.

• Do some research Magellan didn’t prove the earth is a globe .. that is the problem with indoctrinated people they can’t think for themselves

7. Perfect example of the absolute wretched state of science education in this country; it is pitiful, and we as a nation deserve whatever we get for our willful ignorance.
Just as one example pulled from the pile of garbage, lies, and half-truths printed above: “Surveyors, engineers and architects are never required to factor the supposed curvature of the Earth into their projects, providing another proof the world is a plane, not a planet.”

This lie is a whopper, and I have seen it repeated over and over again in the flat earth community. It is absolutely, categorically 100{5f621241b214ad2ec6cd4f506191303eb2f57539ef282de243c880c2b328a528} false. There are two types of land surveying: plane and geodetic. In plane surveying, the work is done in an area small enough that the enormous curvature of the earth can be disregarded. Geodetic surveying is used for large-scale projects where the curvature of the earth must be taken into account.

I have worked in the tunneling industry for almost 20 years. Guess what survey method is used to guide tunnel boring machines to their intended destination? Anyone? Yes, geodetic surveying. There is a tunneling conference held every year or so called the Rapid Excavation and Tunneling Conference (RETC). They publish conference proceedings, which compile the technical papers submitted at the gathering. You can read many technical papers on the topic of geodetic surveys put into practice on tunneling projects all over the world going back decades.

This is just one example of how easily falsehoods spread among a cohort of people who are locked into a mindset (“everything is a lie”), and don’t really care to find out any facts. After all, SGT just told you this guy is a “truth” researcher, so no need to look into the claims, right?

The problem with having too much of an open mind, is that you run the risk of your brain falling out.

• I completely agree & thx so much for putting it so lucidly in scientific terms, which I was unable to do.
Sean, I plead you to nuke this post off of your site, or else many years of your hard work would be in danger of being discredited for a psyop bullshit like this. You (correctly) slam the Google Sundar Pichai for suppressing “Fake News”. But this post is falling into a bait & switch trap for adding fuel to their argument.

• Excellent point Rdawg!
How about this simple little gem (even though gravity has been shown to “curve” light, it’s a lot less affect than gravity has upon a body of water, etc).

Shoot a powerful laser beam, level with the surface of a body of water, and the beam rises above the surface and ends up going into space. The water will always seek its own “level”, but the laser beam will rise higher and higher elevation above the surface of the water as it travels 20, 100, 500, and 2000 miles from the point of origin.

If the earth was flat, then the laser beam would always remain the same elevation above the surface of the water, both at the point of origin, or as far away as 2000 miles from the origination point. (Duh.)

8. Not impressed with surveying engineers who have no understanding of how gravity & mass are at work.Mechanical survey engineers are trained to deal with mechanical “levels” and not concerned with how gravity exerts it’s forces from within the center of mass of a sphere.

Clif High got tired of the “flat earthers”, and gives a challenge, etc, with 5 reasons why we don’t live on a flat earth.

• Do some research Magellan didn’t prove the earth is a globe .. that is the problem with indoctrinated people they can’t think for themselves

9. Take it easy folks. The flat earth theory is something interesting to consider. It need not unravel your sense of reality.

10. I checked, but it’s not April Fools today, so I’m curious about what kind of joke this is.
I check your site because it has many links to interesting and important stories and videos, and you do some fine interviews yourself. Why you torpedo your credibility with patent nonsense like this is beyond me. By now Sgtreport is only aspiring to be as credible as the National Enquirer.

I’m starting to hope that you find one of the edges of our planet and sail right over it.

• Yep. I wish items like this were relegated solely to The Phaser where they could feel at home with the likes of Secureteam 10’s garbage

11. The two towers of the Verrazano-Narrows Bridge are not parallel. They are 1 5/8 inches farther apart at the top than they are at the base.
When talking about “level” you have to consider the reference point. On a globe, that reference is a common point, not referenced from a common line.

12. 21Do you not know? Have you not heard? Has it not been declared to you from the beginning? Have you not understood from the foundations of the earth? 22It is He who sits above the circle of the earth, And its inhabitants are like grasshoppers, Who stretches out the heavens like a curtain And spreads them out like a tent to dwell in. 23He it is who reduces rulers to nothing, Who makes the judges of the earth meaningless.…Isaiah 40:21-23

13. Simple surface surveying methods are easy to determine that the earth is “curved”, simply by setting up 2 survey stations, let’s say, 2 miles apart, along a shoreline of a calm lake, but with the surface of the lake in between the stations.
Since the calculated curvature is 8″ per linear mile, stations on a lake front that are 2 miles apart, would be able to measure 16″ of curvature, HOW?

The Laser beam again, at one station, pointing at the “elevation stick” at the 2nd station, putting the laser, just 1″ above the surface of the water, pointing it at the 1″ mark on the “elevation stick”, would be possible to see the beam hitting the 1″ mark at the target stick, ONLY if the earth was flat.

But if the earth is curved, then laser beam would hit the water, in less than 1/4 mile from the laser.
For the laser to be able to stay above the surface of the water for 2 miles, it would have to hit the 16-17″ (or higher) mark on the target stick.

I believe they’ve done surveys like this long ago, with plain old optics (long before the laser). The “Flat Earthers” never like to talk about this stuff, it puts a quick end to their “discussion”.

14. “Flat Earth” is without a doubt the biggest ps-ops in the history of the Internet. I believe Clif High says it is a D.O.D. research project, most likely aimed at discrediting the truth movement and “muddying the waters”.
I’ve had numerous encounters with these “Flat Earth” shills on Youtube. I’ve personally pointed many satellite dishes over the years, and as a HAM operator I’ve worked amateur satellites with as little as 4 Watts of power. But they guy told me I am obviously a liar and “that nobody has actually seen a satellite orbit the Earth before”. What a f*cking reject!! You can see many LO satellites in the orbit making a perfect arc in the skies on a clear day!

15. I was initially drawn here years and years ago by interesting interviews and articles that dealt with the state of the economy, geopolitics, and prepping.
Over time, the articles featuring kooky and bizarre topics presented as fact have gotten so numerous that I can scarcely bear to visit any longer. In fact I generally only check in once every day or two, unless I am actively kicking fonestar in the balls, in which case I might look in more frequently.

Before long, I will probably just pack it in. Besides, how much doom porn does one really need? It’s too bad; this place used to be informative. Now the crazies have almost taken over.

• Please name one single time when you have kicked fonestar in the balls? Your arguments are weak and illogical.

• Just about every time we have interacted, your little man-marbles have ended up getting punted up into your throat.

• Well put, Rdawg. It seems the people with common sense are starting to tune out of Sgtreport, leaving behind all the kooks who believe this sort of garbage. And when you question it, the kooks start their insults and accuse you of being a troll, as if no other points of view are possible. Just like a bunch of SJWs, but with a different set of nonsensical beliefs.

16. “This allowance for curvature means this – that it is 8” for the first mile of a canal, and increasing at the ratio by the square of the distance in miles; thus a small navigable canal for boats, say 30 miles long, will have, by the above rule an allowance for curvature of 600 feet.”
This must be COMMON CORE MATH taught in schools today. “… increasing at the ratio by the square of the distance in miles…” WTF? How about just simply multiplying 8 inches times 30 miles? You get 240 inches or 20 feet. NOT 600 feet as written above.

• Sorry, you’re incorrect. The general equation of a circle centered at zero is r^2=x^2+y^2. The change in y as you move along the circumference of the circle is a square function (power of 2).

17. so Galileo lost a digit fur nuffin?
watched 1 of Marty’s vids. previously watched 2:20 of vid that gave numerous “theories” a friend sent me who is convinced it’s flat.

with everything going on in the world, this is a colossal waste of time.

one reason i cannot reconcile the FE theory is the length of days depending where you live…equator being closes to a constant. also directly related to D deficiency.

reason 2…the megalithic mile/yard.

reason 3…Leibnitz, Newton & Descartes all 3 made cryptic statements about hidden formulae the peeps weren’t privy to. let’s add Eve in there to round it out with, how do you like them apples?

reason 4…constellations below the equator are NEVER seen in the northern hemisphere & vice versa.

i think our time would be better used with RDS on UNRIG.

this man too, needs our support.

18. Keep looking into it Sean. I first looked into the flat earth to debunk it about about year ago. After 100+ hours investigating the topic I believe the earth is not a ball like we’ve been programed to think. Alev is right, if you spend a day reading some articles and watching some videos you may not be convinced but you will have more questions than answers. Some of the best guys to go to on the subject are Eric Dubay, Mark Sargent, ODD Reality, Jeranism, DITRH, MrThriveAndSurvive.
Thanks for everything you do at SGT. I’ve been coming to this site since 2011.

KJ

19. I have some earth science (geo-physics if you will) to share that shows we live on a rotating sphere, a rotating oblate spheroid to be exact, and not this alleged flat earth nonsense that some have been convinced to believe via some deceptive pseudoscience youtube videos which employs sophistry.
Free rotating gyroscopes will conserve angular momentum and always point in the same direction. If you spin up a free rotating gyroscope and point it straight up, you can determine that the earth is rotating, and the angle shown below, or the angle between the angular momentum of the earth and the angular momentum of the gyroscope.

If the earth were flat, a gyroscope pointed up would always point up. However this is not the case. In fact, the angle between the earth’s angular momentum vector and the gyroscope’s angular momentum vector is the latitude at which the gyroscope is located. This means that the earths surface is tilted by (90-latitude) degrees from the axis of rotation, which can only occur for a round (spherical) earth.

Strong magnetic fields allow levitation of apparently nonmagnetic substances due to their weak but not negligible diamagnetic response of about 10-5. Importantly, the diamagnetic force compensates gravity on the level of individual atoms and molecules and, therefore, can be used to mimic a continuous zero-gravity environment that, otherwise, is only achievable on board of a space station.

How Gyroscopes Work
Gyroscopes are used everywhere. They’re in devices and technology of all kinds, from the smartphone in your pocket to the new horizons probe in the outer reaches of the solar system. But what are they, why are they used and how do they work?

Going beyond gyroscopes to show the earth is spinning, a Foucault Pendulum shows this marvelously well. On a stationary, flat earth there would be no precession. How do you explain the precession of a Foucault Pendulum with a flat earth model??

How do the proponents of the flat earth hypothesis explain that a Foucault Pendulum precesses at different rates at different latitudes with the flat earth model?

The Foucault Pendulum
http://www.animations.physics.unsw.edu.au/jw/foucault_pendulum.html

The earth is not flat people, it’s a rotating sphere and REAL science show us that.

20. To most people, Ball or Flat Plain won’t matter. Most people don’t know who they are or what they are… and that is the point. Even flat earthers won’t ask the next logical question. So to most people, it really doesn’t matter. Once you realize WHO (which group) is deceiving humanity it’s easy to start stripping away all the false doctrines, and the correct world view takes shape. Why the deception? That’s a great question. To keep people feeling small and powerless. Why is that important? If you’re existence is an accident on an accidental planet, then people lose PURPOSE and MEANING.

21. My thoughts were that the evidences that I can see with my own eyes for a spherical Earth are pretty strong. Short of going many miles into space and looking at the Earth from a window of a space ship, what can we see?
1. Lots of round balls. Get a telescope no more that 40X or 60X, and take a look at Jupiter or Mars, and what do you see? Something that is clearly a sphere. Forget the telescope and look at the moon, and again, a sphere. Whether one subscribes to Evolution or Creationism or whatever, wouldn’t it make sense that no matter how the Universe was formed that the object we live on is similar in shape to whatever other bodies that we can see?

2. Speaking of the moon, that body allows us to see the curvature of the Earth during a Lunar Eclipse, as the Earth casts its shadow onto the moon.

So I’m all for questioning everything (“moon landings” anyone?), but to me, this one seems awfully cut-and-dried. Some interesting points were brought up about the Suez, which made me wonder about the 30-40-mile-long Roman aqueducts, and to what extent the curvature of the Earth affected the planning and operation of those devices.

22. The Ball Earth theory must be defended at all costs in order to deceive the world into accepting:1 world govt
1 world religion
1 world currency